Holloway Editione1.0.0
Updated August 14, 2024Youβre reading an excerpt of Great Founders Write, by Ben Putano, writer, entrepreneur, and book publisher. Heβs the founder of Damn Gravity Media, a publishing house that inspires and educates tomorrowβs great founders. Purchase now for lifetime access to the book and on-demand video course.
The βfog of warβ is a military term that describes the confusion and chaos that covers a battlefield. It can be blinding and disorienting. During times of crisis, when the fog of war is thick, leaders need to help their people reach the other side in one piece.
Robinhood again failed this test in spectacular fashion. Not only did they fail to provide a helpful explanation for freezing $GME, but they sent readers on a wild goose chase to find their own answers.
Hereβs a paragraph from Robinhoodβs blog post on January 28:
Amid significant market volatility, itβs important as ever that we help customers stay informed. Thatβs why weβre committed to providing people with educational resources. We recently revamped and expanded Robinhood Learn to help people take advantage of the hundreds of financial resources we offer and educate themselves, including how to make sense of a volatile market.
(Emphasis added)
When you click the link to go to Robinhood Learn, it doesnβt go to a specific article, but straight to the resource center homepage. The first post is titled, βInvesting 101.β
Insulting.
In this case, Robinhood was less than helpful. They were condescending. They might as well have said, βYou clearly donβt understand how the stock market works. Let us enlighten you.β
The next day, on January 29, the comms team published another blog post, this one about the financial mechanics behind trading. Again, they failed to provide a helpful explanation for the $GME freeze. Buried three-quarters down the page, in the back half of an unassuming paragraph, was this jargon-filled statement:
This week alone, our clearinghouse-mandated deposit requirements related to equities increased ten-fold. And thatβs what led us to put temporary buying restrictions in place on a small number of securities that the clearinghouses had raised their deposit requirements on.
(Note: During a crisis, itβs critical to write using the inverted business pyramid we discussed earlier in this book)
It wasnβt until three full days later, on February 1, that Robinhood finally provided a simple, clear explanation for their actions:
Simply put, Robinhood limited buying in volatile securities to ensure it complied with deposit regulations.
But by that point, the Robinhoodβs reputation was destroyed. The opportunity to help their users through the crisis had long passed.
Robinhoodβs decision to freeze $GME turned a chaotic situation into a crisis. Yet the company never took responsibility for their role.
Without Robinhoodβs zero-commission trading tool, the short squeeze would have never been possible. Did they ever consider something like this could happen? Itβs not like they didnβt have warning signsβGME trade volume rose rapidly throughout the month of January, which meant Robinhood needed more and more cash on hand to cover deposits. In hindsight, couldnβt they have been more prepared?
Worst of all, Robinhood never took responsibility for fixing the situation. After announcing the stock freeze, they made no indication they were working to unfreeze them. Instead, they seemed to blame their customers for the freeze: