4. Be Helpful

4 links
From

Holloway Editione1.0.0

Updated August 14, 2024
Great Founders Write
Common questions covered here
How do I actually help customers during a company crisis instead of making things worse?
What does condescending crisis communication look like?
Why should I put the most important information first during a crisis?
Show 1 more

You’re reading an excerpt of Great Founders Write, by Ben Putano, writer, entrepreneur, and book publisher. He’s the founder of Damn Gravity Media, a publishing house that inspires and educates tomorrow’s great founders. Purchase now for lifetime access to the book and on-demand video course.

The β€œfog of war” is a military term that describes the confusion and chaos that covers a battlefield. It can be blinding and disorienting. During times of crisis, when the fog of war is thick, leaders need to help their people reach the other side in one piece.

Robinhood again failed this test in spectacular fashion. Not only did they fail to provide a helpful explanation for freezing $GME, but they sent readers on a wild goose chase to find their own answers.

Here’s a paragraph from Robinhood’s blog post on January 28:

Amid significant market volatility, it’s important as ever that we help customers stay informed. That’s why we’re committed to providing people with educational resources. We recently revamped and expanded Robinhood Learn to help people take advantage of the hundreds of financial resources we offer and educate themselves, including how to make sense of a volatile market.

(Emphasis added)

Insulting.

In this case, Robinhood was less than helpful. They were condescending. They might as well have said, β€œYou clearly don’t understand how the stock market works. Let us enlighten you.”

The next day, on January 29, the comms team published another blog post, this one about the financial mechanics behind trading. Again, they failed to provide a helpful explanation for the $GME freeze. Buried three-quarters down the page, in the back half of an unassuming paragraph, was this jargon-filled statement:

This week alone, our clearinghouse-mandated deposit requirements related to equities increased ten-fold. And that’s what led us to put temporary buying restrictions in place on a small number of securities that the clearinghouses had raised their deposit requirements on.

(Note: During a crisis, it’s critical to write using the inverted business pyramid we discussed earlier in this book)

It wasn’t until three full days later, on February 1, that Robinhood finally provided a simple, clear explanation for their actions:

Simply put, Robinhood limited buying in volatile securities to ensure it complied with deposit regulations.

But by that point, the Robinhood’s reputation was destroyed. The opportunity to help their users through the crisis had long passed.

5. Be Accountable

Robinhood’s decision to freeze $GME turned a chaotic situation into a crisis. Yet the company never took responsibility for their role.

Without Robinhood’s zero-commission trading tool, the short squeeze would have never been possible. Did they ever consider something like this could happen? It’s not like they didn’t have warning signsβ€”GME trade volume rose rapidly throughout the month of January, which meant Robinhood needed more and more cash on hand to cover deposits. In hindsight, couldn’t they have been more prepared?

Worst of all, Robinhood never took responsibility for fixing the situation. After announcing the stock freeze, they made no indication they were working to unfreeze them. Instead, they seemed to blame their customers for the freeze:

You’re reading a preview of an online book. Buy it now for lifetime access to expert knowledge, including future updates.
If you found this post worthwhile, please share!